Convert Nanocuries to Rutherfords
Nanocurie (nCi) to Rutherford (Rd) radioactivity conversion — enter any value below to get an instant result, or use the table for common values.
Results from this calculator are estimates provided for general informational purposes only, based on formulas, rates, and standards commonly accepted as of 2026. Figures may differ slightly from other calculators or professional sources due to rounding methods, differing assumptions, or regional regulations, and rules may change over time. Always consult a qualified professional — such as a financial advisor, healthcare provider, or other relevant specialist — before making decisions based on these results.
Result
1 nCi = 3.7E-05 Rd
1 Nanocurie = 3.7E-05 Rutherfords
1 Rutherford = 27027.027 Nanocuries
1 nCi in every supported unit
Conversion chart: Nanocurie to Rutherfords
Conversion table
| Nanocurie (nCi) | Rutherford (Rd) |
|---|---|
| 0.01 nCi | 3.7E-07 Rd |
| 0.1 nCi | 3.7E-06 Rd |
| 1 nCi | 3.7E-05 Rd |
| 2 nCi | 7.4E-05 Rd |
| 3 nCi | 0.000111 Rd |
| 5 nCi | 0.000185 Rd |
| 10 nCi | 0.00037 Rd |
| 20 nCi | 0.00074 Rd |
| 50 nCi | 0.00185 Rd |
| 100 nCi | 0.0037 Rd |
| 1000 nCi | 0.037 Rd |
Nanocurie (nCi)
Definition: An SI-prefixed submultiple of the curie equal to one billionth of a curie (37 decays per second), a scale used for very low-level laboratory tracer work.
History: It follows the curie's historical origin, scaled down by the standard nano- prefix as laboratory tracer techniques advanced to work with vanishingly small quantities of radioactive material.
Current use: Used in research settings for extremely small tracer quantities, such as certain biochemical labeling experiments that require minimal radioactivity for safety and regulatory reasons.
Rutherford (Rd)
Definition: A short-lived unit of activity equal to exactly one million decays per second, sitting between the becquerel and the curie in magnitude.
History: Named after physicist Ernest Rutherford in recognition of his foundational work on radioactive decay and atomic structure, the rutherford was proposed in the mid-20th century as a more convenient laboratory-scale unit than the curie, but never gained wide adoption and was mostly abandoned once the SI standardized on the becquerel in 1975.
Current use: Now found mainly in older mid-20th-century physics literature rather than in any current measurement practice.
Supported Units
| Unit | Symbol | In Bq |
|---|---|---|
| Becquerel | Bq | 1 Bq |
| Terabecquerel | TBq | 1E+12 Bq |
| Gigabecquerel | GBq | 1E+09 Bq |
| Megabecquerel | MBq | 1000000 Bq |
| Kilobecquerel | kBq | 1000 Bq |
| Millibecquerel | mBq | 0.001 Bq |
| Curie | Ci | 3.7E+10 Bq |
| Kilocurie | kCi | 3.7E+13 Bq |
| Millicurie | mCi | 37000000 Bq |
| Microcurie | µCi | 37000 Bq |
| Nanocurie | nCi | 37 Bq |
| Picocurie | pCi | 0.037 Bq |
| Rutherford | Rd | 1000000 Bq |
| One/Second | 1/s | 1 Bq |
| Disintegrations/Second | dis/s | 1 Bq |
| Disintegrations/Minute | dis/min | 0.016666667 Bq |
About These Parameters
- Value
- The activity you want to convert, expressed in the "From" unit. Accepts decimals, and can represent anything from a trace laboratory tracer in nanocuries to an industrial gamma-radiography source in terabecquerels.
- From Unit
- The unit your activity figure is currently measured in — a nuclear-medicine dose sheet's millicuries, an environmental report's becquerels per kilogram, or an older physics text's rutherfords.
- To Unit
- The unit you want the result converted into. Use the swap button to flip From and To instantly, which is handy when translating a US clinical curie figure into the modern SI becquerel or vice versa.
How Radioactivity Conversion Works
The Formula
Every unit here is defined by a fixed multiplier relative to the becquerel. To convert a value from one unit to another:
result = value × (factor of "From" unit ÷ factor of "To" unit)
For Nanocurie → Rutherford: multiply by 3.7E-05. For example, 1 nCi × 3.7E-05 = 3.7E-05 Rd.
Why the Curie Is Still Everywhere Despite Becquerel Being the SI Standard
The curie was defined in the early 20th century as the activity of exactly one gram of radium-226 — a huge number of decays per second (37 billion) that happened to match the quantities researchers were actually handling at the time. When the SI adopted the becquerel in 1975 as a deliberately small, easy-to-reason-about unit (one decay per second), it created a scale mismatch: real sources that were "1 curie" became "37 billion becquerel," an awkward number to say or write. US medical and industrial practice never fully switched over, which is why millicuries and microcuries still dominate American clinical paperwork even as the rest of the world reports in kilobecquerels and megabecquerels.
Activity Is Not the Same as Dose
A source's activity tells you how many atoms are decaying every second, but says nothing about how much of that radiation actually reaches and is absorbed by a person or object — that depends on distance (radiation intensity falls off with distance), shielding, and the type of radiation being emitted (alpha particles barely penetrate skin; gamma rays pass through substantial shielding). A one-curie source sealed behind thick lead delivers a far lower dose rate than the same source held in an open hand. That's why radiation-safety training treats activity and dose rate as two separate numbers that must both be known, never one inferred from the other.
Example
An activity of 1 nCi equals 3.7E-05 Rd. For scale, a typical nuclear-medicine diagnostic dose is a few hundred megabecquerels (roughly 10-30 millicuries), household smoke detectors contain an americium-241 source of about 1 microcurie (37,000 becquerels), and industrial radiography sources used for inspecting welds commonly run several terabecquerels (tens to hundreds of curies).
Frequently Asked Questions
How many Rutherfords are in 1 Nanocurie?
1 Nanocurie (nCi) equals exactly 3.7E-05 Rutherfords (Rd).
What's the difference between a becquerel and a curie?
Both measure activity (decays per second), but on very different scales. One becquerel is exactly one decay per second; one curie is 37 billion decays per second — the activity originally defined as one gram of radium-226. Because the curie is so large, real sources are usually quoted in millicuries or microcuries, while becquerel figures are more often scaled up with mega- or giga- prefixes.
Does higher activity always mean higher radiation exposure?
Not necessarily. Activity only describes the source's own decay rate — the actual dose someone receives also depends on distance from the source, shielding in between, exposure time, and the type of radiation emitted. A highly active but well-shielded or distant source can deliver a lower dose rate than a much less active source held close by. See the separate Radiation Converter for dose rate specifically.
What is the rutherford and why isn't it used anymore?
The rutherford, named after physicist Ernest Rutherford, was a mid-20th-century unit equal to one million decays per second — a middle ground between becquerel and curie. It never gained wide international adoption and was effectively abandoned once the SI standardized on the becquerel in 1975, so it now appears only in older physics literature.
Why are disintegrations/minute used instead of disintegrations/second in some labs?
Liquid-scintillation counters and similar laboratory instruments historically reported raw counts on a per-minute basis, matching typical counting-run durations, so biochemistry and radiochemistry labs still commonly report activity in disintegrations (or counts) per minute rather than converting to the SI per-second convention.